PSYCHOLOGICAL EFFECTS AND ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS OF SEVERE MALFORMATION IN THE FETUS

Authors

  • Elena TARCA “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania
  • Irina Geanina CRISCOV “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania
  • Alina Mariela MURGU “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania
  • Letiţia Doina DUCEAC “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania
  • B. SAVU “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania

Abstract

PSYCHOLOGICAL EFFECTS AND ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS OF SEVERE MALFORMATION IN THE FETUS (Abstract): Considered from the standpoint of the parents’ and medical team’s rights, the prenatal diagnosis of severe inborn malformations is an ethical and legal must, which carries a twofold meaning: recognition of the women’s right to abortion and fetus protection. The purposes of our paper are: to reveal the psychological effect of antenatal diagnosis in case of fetal malformation; to point out a series of ethical implications of elective abortion of fetuses or discontinuation of the treatment of newborns suffering from multiple malformations; and to draw attention on the low antenatal diagnosis rates in our country. Material and methods: In Romania, on a 23-year-long study conducted over 115 neonates suffering from gastroschisis and on 105 newborns with omphalocele, the rate of antenatal malformation diagnosis was very low, and implicitly leaded to a high malformation and chromosomal aberration incidence and hence to a high neonatal mortality rate. Also, the birth of these babies set a considerable financial burden on pediatric surgery wards for the somewhat hopeless treatment. Results: Most of the times, making abortion decisions, caring for or discontinuing the treatment of newborns suffering from multiple malformations also have a negative impact on the family. Whichever the case, any choice made about an abnormal fetus should be respected and protected by the family, the laws in effect and the country’s culture and social structures. Conclusions: It is the parents who should decide the future of the pregnancy or, when there was no antenatal diagnosis, of the neonate; the decision must be made after having been well informed by a multidisciplinary medical team.

Author Biographies

  • Elena TARCA, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania

    Faculty of Medicine
    Department of Surgery (II)
    “Sfânta Maria” Clinical Emergency Children’s Hospital Iaşi

  • Irina Geanina CRISCOV, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania

    Faculty of Medicine
    Department of Mother and Child Medicine
    “Sfânta Maria” Clinical Emergency Children’s Hospital Iaşi

  • Alina Mariela MURGU, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania

    Faculty of Medicine
    Department of Mother and Child Medicine
    “Sfânta Maria” Clinical Emergency Children’s Hospital Iaşi

  • Letiţia Doina DUCEAC, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania

    “Sfânta Maria” Clinical Emergency Children’s Hospital Iaşi

  • B. SAVU, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania

    Faculty of Medicine
    Department of Surgery (II)
    “Sfânta Maria” Clinical Emergency Children’s Hospital Iaşi

References

1. Aite L, Trucchi A, Nahom A, et al. Multidisciplinary management of fetal surgical anomalies: the impact on maternal anxiety. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2002; 12(2): 90-94.
2. Lunzer H, Menardi G, Brezinka C. Long-term follow-up of children with prenatally diagnosed om-phalocele and gastroschisis. J Matern Fetal Med 2001; 10(6): 385-392.
3. Caniano DA, Baylis F. Ethical considerations in prenatal surgical consultation. Pediatr Surg Int 1999; 15(5-6): 303-309.
4. Fletcher J. Abortion; infanticide. Humanhood: essays in biomedical ethics. New York: Prometheus Books 1979; 132-148.
5. Giubilini A, Minerva F. After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? J Med Ethics 2013; 39(5): 261-263.
6. Ţarcă E, Aprodu SG, Straticiuc-Ciongradi I, Goţia DG. Clinical aspects and course in syndromic omphalocele. Ro J Pediatr 2013; LXII(2): 171-179.
7. Ţarcă E, Aprodu SG. Gastroschisis treatment: what are the causes of high morbidity and mortality rates? Chirurgia (Bucur) 2013; 108(4): 516-520.
8. Barisic I, Clementi M, Häusler M, Gjergja R, Kern J, Stoll C; Euroscan Study Group. Evaluation of prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of fetal abdominal wall defects by 19 European registries. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18(4): 309-316.
9. Henrich K, Huemmer HP, Reingruber B, Weber PG. Gastroschisis and omphalocele: treatments and long-term outcomes. Pediatr Surg Int 2008; 24(2): 167-173.
10. Lam PK, Torfs CP. Interaction between maternal smoking and malnutrition in infant risk of gas-troschisis. Birth Defects Res a Clin Mol Teratol 2006; 76(3): 182-186.
11. Draper ES, Rankin J, Tonks AM, et al. Recreational drug use: a major risk factor for gastroschisis? Am J Epidem 2008; 167(4): 485-491.
12. Snyder CL. Outcome analysis for gastroschisis. J Pediatr Surg 1999; 34(8): 1253-1256.
13. Kemp J, Davenport M, Pernet A. Antenatally diagnosed surgical anomalies: the psychological effect of parental antenatal counseling. J Pediatr Surg 1998; 33: 1376-1379.
14. Aite L, Trucchi A, Nahom A, Zaccara A, La Sala E, Bagolan P. Antenatal diagnosis of surgically correctable anomalies: effects of repeated consultations on parental anxiety. J Perinatol 2003; 23(8): 652-654.
15. Fratelli N, Papageorghiou AT, Bhide A, Sharma A, Okoye B, Thilaganathan B. Outcome of antenatally diagnosed abdominal wall defects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 30(3): 266-270.
16. Helbig A, Kaasen A, Malt UF, Haugen G. Psychological distress after recent detection of fetal mal-formation: short-term effect on second-trimester uteroplacental and fetoplacental circulation. BJOG 2011; 118(13): 1653-1657.
17. Cauneac RM, Stefan G, Carausu M, Stratulat IS. Role of the rehabilitation hospital in the social and economic integration of persons with disabilities. Rev. Med. Chir. Soc. Med. Nat. Iasi 2017; 121(4): 666-672.
18. Marteau T, Cook R, Kidd J, Johnston M, Slack J, Shaw R. The psychological effects of false-positive results in prenatal screening for fetal abnormality: a prospective study. Prenat Diagn 1992; 12: 205-214.
19. Forrester MB, Merz RD. Epidemiology of abdominal wall defects, Hawaii, 1986-1997. Teratology 1999; 60: 117-123.
20. Avătăjiţei MC, Moscalu M, Onofriescu M. Etica avortului în screening-ul şi diagnosticul prenatal al anomaliilor cromozomiale numerice. Revista Română de Bioetică 2012; 10(3): 38-45.
21. Buta M.G., Buta L. Perspectivele teologice ale bioeticii. Revista Română de Bioetică 2012; 10(1): 27-33.
22. Gauderer MW, Jassani MN, Izant RJ Jr. Ultrasonographic antenatal diagnosis: will it change the spectrum of neonatal surgery? J Pediatr Surg 1984; 19(4): 404-407.
23. Edvardsson K, Small R, Lalos A, Persson M, Mogren I. Ultrasound’s ‘window on the womb’ brings ethical challenges for balancing maternal and fetal health interests: obstetricians’ experiences in Aus-tralia. BMC Med Ethics 2015; 16: 31-35.
24. Gillon R. Is there a 'new ethics of abortion'? J Med Ethics 2001; 27(Suppl 2): 5-9.
25. Lawrence DJ. The Four Principles of Biomedical Ethics: A Foundation for Current Bioethical Debate. J Chiropr Humanit 2007; 14: 34-40.
26. Gillon R. Ethics needs principles- four can encompass the rest- and respect for autonomy should be “first among equals”. J Med Ethics 2003; 29: 307-312.
27. Verhagen E and Sauer PJ. The Groningen protocol-euthanasia in severely ill newborns. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 959-962.
28. Vanden Eijnden S, Martinovici D. Neonatal euthanasia: A claim for an immoral law. Clin Ethics 2013; 8(2-3): 75-84.
29. Dageville C, Betremieux P, Gold F, et al. The French Society of Neonatology’s proposals for neonatal end-oflife decision-making. Neonatology 2011; 100: 206-214.
30. Jefferies AL, Kirpalani HM; Canadian Pediatric Society Fetus and Newborn Committee. Counselling and management for anticipated extremely preterm birth. Pediatr Child Health 2012; 17(8): 443-446.
31. Egnew TR. The Meaning of Healing: Transcending Suffering. Ann Fam Med. 2005; 3(3): 255-262.
32. Dumitras S, Enache M, Miron I, Ioan B. Implications of the lack of Romanian legal framework on the medical attitude toward terminal pediatric patients-case study. Revista Română de Bioetică 2013; 11(1): 141-152.

Additional Files

Published

2019-03-29

Issue

Vol. 123 No. 1 (2019): The Medical-Surgical Journal

Section

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE - LABORATORY

License

COPYRIGHT 
Once an article is accepted for publication, MSJ requests a transfer of copyrights for published articles.

COPYRIGHT TRANSFER FORM FOR 

REVISTA MEDICO-CHIRURGICALĂ A SOCIETĂȚII DE MEDICI ȘI NATURALIȘTI DIN IAȘI /

THE MEDICAL-SURGICAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF PHYSICIANS AND NATURALISTS FROM IASI

We, the undersigned authors of the manuscript entitled

_____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

warrant that this manuscript, which is submitted for publication in the REVISTA MEDICO-CHIRURGICALĂ, has not been published and it is not under consideration for publication in another journal.

  1. we give the consent for publication in the REVISTA MEDICO-CHIRURGICALĂ, in printed and electronic format and we transfer unconditioned and complete the copyright of this manuscript to the REVISTA MEDICO-CHIRURGICALĂ, in the event of its acceptance.
  2. the manuscript does not break the intellectual property rights of any other person.
  3. we have read the submitted version of the manuscript and we are fully responsible for the content.

Names and signatures of authors / copyright owners (the following sequence is the authorship of the article):

  1. ______________________________/_________________________
  2. ______________________________/_________________________
  3. ______________________________/_________________________

N.B.  All the authors must sign this form