OPTIMIZATION OF PCR BASED ON DNA QUALITY IN ONCOLOGICAL RISK POPULATION DNA SAMPLES FROM BENIN

Authors

  • Sara Y. HOUNGUE University of Abomey Calavi (UAC), Benin
  • Haboubacar Elhadji Yaou MOUSSA University of Abomey Calavi (UAC), Benin
  • Venceslyne AGBAZAHOU University of Abomey Calavi (UAC), Benin
  • Aliona MORARIU “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania
  • Anca NEGURA “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Iasi, Romania
  • Alina MANOLE “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania
  • Callinice D. CAPOCHICHI University of Abomey Calavi (UAC), Benin
  • Doina AZOICAI “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania
  • L. NEGURA “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania

Keywords:

BRCA1, BREAST CANCER, PROSTATE CANCER, MULTIPLEX-PCR

Abstract

In Benin, like other countries in the sub-Saharan region, breast cancer ranks first among all cancers. Material and methods: A highly heterogenic collection of 120 DNA samples from breast and prostate cancer patients and matched controls was available for further study on detection of BRCA1/2 gene mutations pattern. Results: Initially, the PCR amplification of BRCA1 exon 5 was performed for all samples, with poor results in terms of PCR efficiency. Only about a third of the samples showed visible bands of the expected size and with no contamination. A re-evaluation of DNA samples showed high variability on DNA concentration and quality, due to different extraction methods, sample origin and preservation condition. Conclusions: Our study primarily illustrate that DNA extracted from different tissue by different extraction methods may be damaged but still usable, by increasing the DNA amount in the PCR reactions and adjusting the other PCR parameters. However, appropriate caution should be exercised when analyzing samples derived from different tissue sources. By appropriate optimization, heterogenous samples can be simultaneously used for PCR amplifications with single parameters.

Author Biographies

  • Sara Y. HOUNGUE, University of Abomey Calavi (UAC), Benin

    Faculty of Sciences and Technics (FAST),
    Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology
    Laboratory of Molecular Biomarkers in Cancer and Nutrition (BMCN)

  • Haboubacar Elhadji Yaou MOUSSA, University of Abomey Calavi (UAC), Benin

    Faculty of Sciences and Technics (FAST)
    Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology
    Laboratory of Molecular Biomarkers in Cancer and Nutrition (BMCN)

  • Venceslyne AGBAZAHOU, University of Abomey Calavi (UAC), Benin

    Faculty of Sciences and Technics (FAST)
    Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology
    Laboratory of Molecular Biomarkers in Cancer and Nutrition (BMCN)

  • Aliona MORARIU, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania

    Department of Oncogenetics

  • Anca NEGURA, “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Iasi, Romania

    Department of Biology

  • Alina MANOLE, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania

    Department of Preventive Medicine and Interdisciplinarity

  • Callinice D. CAPOCHICHI, University of Abomey Calavi (UAC), Benin

    Faculty of Sciences and Technics (FAST),
    Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology;
    Laboratory of Molecular Biomarkers in Cancer and Nutrition (BMCN),

  • Doina AZOICAI, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania

    Department of Oncogenetics
    Department of Preventive Medicine and Interdisciplinarity

  • L. NEGURA, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania

    Department of Oncogenetics

References

1. Hercules SM, Alnajar M, Chen C, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer prevalence in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2022; 12(5): e055735.
2. Egue M, Gnangnon FHR, Akele-Akpo MT, Maxwell Parkin D. Cancer incidence in Cotonou (Benin), 2014-2016: First results from the cancer Registry of Cotonou. Cancer Epidemiol 2019; 59: 46-50.
3. Miki Y, Swensen J, Shattuck-Eidens D, et al. A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1. Science 1994; 266: 66-71.
4. Wooster R, Neuhausen SL, Mangion J, et al. Localization of a breast cancer susceptibility gene, BRCA2, to chromosome 13q12-13. Science 1994; 265(5181): 2088-2090.
5. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Familial breast cancer: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 52 epidemiological studies including 58,209 women with breast cancer and 101,986 women without the disease. Lancet 2001; 358: 1389-1399.
6. Chicos A, Negura L, Braescu R, et al. High frequency of BRCA recurrent mutations in a consecutive series of unselected ovarian cancer patients. Romanian Review of Laboratory Medicine 2020; 28(3): 257-266.
7. Negură L, Dușa CP, Balmuș M, et al. BRCA1 5382insC founder mutation has not a significative recurrent presence in North-Eastern Romanian cancer patients. Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology 2015; 56(2): 379-385.
8. Morariu A, Manole A, Azoicăi D. Cancer genetic counseling. Part I - Western European countries. Medical Surgical Journal 2018; 122(3): 552-557.
9. Morariu A, Manole A, Azoicăi D. Cancer genetic counseling in Europe. Part II: Central and Eastern European countries. Medical Surgical Journal 2018; 122 (4): 783-788.
10. Gao Q, Adebamowo CA, Fackenthal J, et al. Protein truncating BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in African women with pre-menopausal breast cancer. Hum Genet 2000; 107: 192-194.
11. Fregene A, Newman LA. Breast cancer in sub-Saharan Africa: How does it relate to breast cancer in African-American women? Cancer 2005; 103 (8): 1540-1550 / doi: 10.1002/cncr.20978.
12. Chan PC, Wong BY, Ozcelik H, Cole DE. Simple and rapid detection of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations by multiplex mutagenically separated PCR. Clin Chem 1999; 45 (8 Pt 1): 1285-1287.
13. Capo-chichi CD, Cai KQ, Smedberg J, Ganjei-Azar P, Godwin AK, Xu XX. Loss of A-type lamin expression compromises nuclear envelope integrity in breast cancer. Chin J Cancer 2011; 30(6): 415-25 / doi: 10.5732/cjc.010.10566.
14. Negură L, Carasevici E, Negură A, Uhrhammer N, Bignon YJ. Identification of a recurrent BRCA1 mutation in two breast / ovarian cancer predisposition families with distinct phenotypes, by using allele-specific multiplex-PCR. Romanian Review of Laboratory Medicine 2010; 18(2): 53-61.
15. Negură L, Popoiu G, Matei M, Azoicăi D, Negură A. Optimization and comparative evaluation of nucleic acids extraction protocols. Analele Ştiinţifice ale Universităţii “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” Iaşi (Serie nouă). Secţiunea a II-a. Genetică şi Biologie Moleculară 2011; XII(4): 41-46.
16. Srinivasan M, Sedmak D, Jewell S. Effect of fixatives and tissue processing on the content and integrity of nucleic acids. Am J Pathol 2002; 161: 1961-1971.
17. Akbari M, Hansen MD, Halgunset J, Skorpen F, Krokan HE. Low copy number DNA template can render polymerase chain reaction error prone in a sequence-dependent manner. J Mol Diagn 2005; 7(1): 36-39 / doi: 10.1016/s1525-1578(10)60006-2.
18. Quach N, Goodman MF, Shibata D. In vitro mutation artifacts after formalin fixation and error prone translesion synthesis during PCR. BMC Clin Pathol 2004; 4: 1.
19. Benita Y, Oosting RS, Lok MC, Wise MJ, Humphery-Smith I. Regionalized GC content of template DNA as a predictor of PCR success. Nucleic Acids Res 2003; 31: e99.

Additional Files

Published

2022-12-27

Issue

Section

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE - LABORATORY