FIRST-LINE MEROPENEM ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY IN ACUTE PERITONITIS SECONDARY TO COLIC PERFORATION. CLINICAL AND HISTOPATHOLOGICAL STUDY ON THE LABORATORY ANIMAL

Authors

  • C.G. FLOREA “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
  • T. SOARE University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Bucharest, Romania
  • I.S. COMAN “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
  • C. COMAN “Cantacuzino” National Institute of Medical Military Development and Research, Romania
  • M. LITESCU “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Romania
  • Violeta Elena COMAN “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Romania
  • Raluca Maria FLOREA “Sf. Ioan” Emergency Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
  • A: ERCHILD “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Romania
  • V.T. GRIGORESCU “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Romania

Abstract

Acute peritonitis accounts for 1% of all on-call visits and is the second leading cause of sepsis worldwide. Annually, due to secondary peritonitis, it is estimated that 20 million years of life are lost, 25 million years are adjusted for disabilities and 896,000 deaths. Fecal peritonitis is one of the most common causes of intensive care admissions with a  mortality rate between 19.1 and 31.6% in some centers exceeding 50%. Material and methods: Taking into account the above, we imagined a study, using laboratory animals, in which we produced sigmoid perforations, then followed their evolution without antibiotic treatment and under antibiotic therapy with Cefuroxime 25 mg/kg/24 hours intravenously or Meropenem 40 mg/kg intravenously, following the tissue changes both macroscopically and microscopically. Results: Our study revealed a mortality rate of 3.33%, the death occurring within 72 hours from the time of perforation. By observing the general condition (clinical point of view), no major differences between batches were found, neither from a macroscopic point of view (inspection of the peritoneal cavity). After microscopic analysis of the peritoneum and sigmoid colon meropenem treatment showed remarkably better results, especially at T4. Conclusions: Meropenem is a first-line antibiotic in acute peritonitis secondary to colonic perforation, which together with surgery can reduce the morbidity and mortality of this pathology.

Author Biographies

  • C.G. FLOREA, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania

    Ph.D. Student, Doctoral School
    “Bagdasar-Arseni” Emergency Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
    Department of General Surgery

  • T. SOARE, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Bucharest, Romania

    Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Histology

  • I.S. COMAN, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania

    Faculty of Medicine Department of Surgery
    “Bagdasar-Arseni” Emergency Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
    Department of General Surgery

  • C. COMAN, “Cantacuzino” National Institute of Medical Military Development and Research, Romania

    Băneasa Research Department

  • M. LITESCU, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Romania

    Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Surgery
    “Sf. Ioan” Emergency Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
    Department of  General Surgery

  • Violeta Elena COMAN, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Romania

    Faculty of Medicine Department of Surgery
    “Bagdasar-Arseni” Emergency Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
    Department of General Surgery

  • Raluca Maria FLOREA, “Sf. Ioan” Emergency Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania

    Department of Gastroenterology

  • A: ERCHILD, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Romania

    Ph.D. Student, Doctoral School
    “Bagdasar-Arseni” Emergency Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
    Department of General Surgery

  • V.T. GRIGORESCU, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Romania

    Faculty of Medicine Department of Surgery
    “Bagdasar-Arseni” Emergency Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
    Department of General Surgery

References

1. Murray CJL, et al. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet (London, England) 2012; 380(9859): 2197-2223 / doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61689-4.
2. Clements TW, Tolonen M, Ball CG, Kirkpatrick AW. Secondary Peritonitis and Intra-Abdominal Sepsis: An Increasingly Global Disease in Search of Better Systemic Therapies. Scand J Surg 2012; 110(2): 139-149 / doi: 10.1177/1457496920984078.
3. Tridente A, et al. Patients with fecal peritonitis admitted to European intensive care units: an epidemiological survey of the GenOSept cohort. Intensive Care Med 2014; 40(2): 202-210 / doi: 10.1007/ s00134-013-3158-7.
4. Scholefield JH, Wyman A, Rogers K. Management of generalized fecal peritonitis-can we do better?, J R Soc Med 1991; 84(11): 664-666.
5. Paul V, Tridente A, Kaur P, Mahmood M, Mellors R, Raithatha AH. Critically ill patients with fecal peritonitis: a 5-year review in a tertiary centre Crit. Care 2015; 19(1): P374 / doi: 10.1186/cc14454.
6. Roth F, Leedahl ND, Leedahl DD, Guerrero DM. Clinical and Financial Impact of Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing in Blood Cultures. Antibiot (Basel, Switzerland) 2022: 11(2) / doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11020122.
7. Eckmann C, Bassetti M. Prognostic factors for mortality in (fecal) peritonitis: back to the roots!, Intensive Care Med 2014; 40(2): 269-271 / doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-3155-x.
8. de S. Pires B, Azevedo IM, Moreira MDCF, Celani LMS, Medeiros AC. Effect of Peritoneal Lavage with Coconut Water in Healing of Colon Anastomosis in Rat Abdominal Sepsis Model. J Surg Clin Res 2017; 8(1): 26 / doi: 10.20398/jscr.v8i1.13033.
9. Ordoñez CA, Puyana JC. Management of peritonitis in the critically ill patient. Surg Clin North Am 2006; 86(6): 1323-1349 / doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2006.09.006.
10. Kumar A, et al. Initiation of inappropriate antimicrobial therapy results in a fivefold reduction of survival in human septic shock. Chest 2009; 136(5): 1237-1248 / doi: 10.1378/chest.09-0087.
11. Türkan F, Huyut Z, Taslimi P, Gülçin I. The in vivo effects of cefazolin, cefuroxime, and cefoperazon on the carbonic anhydrase in different rat tissues. J Biochem Mol Toxicol 2018; 32(3): e22041 / doi: 10.1002/jbt.22041.
12. Mascena GV, Melo MCSC, Gadelha DNB, Oliveira TKB, Brandt CT. Severe autogenously fecal peritonitis in ageing Wistar rats. Response to intravenous meropenem. Acta Cir Bras 2014; 29(9): 615-621 / doi: 10.1590/s0102-8650201400150010.
13. Bielecki K, Kamiński P, Klukowski M. Large bowel perforation: morbidity and mortality. Tech. Coloproctol 2002; 6(3): 177-182 / doi: 10.1007/s101510200039.
14. Doklestić K, et al. Secondary peritonitis-evaluation of 204 cases and literature review. J Med Life 2014; 7(2): 132-138.
15. Biondo S, et al. Prognostic factors for mortality in left colonic peritonitis: a new scoring system11No competing interests declared. J Am Coll Surg 2000; 191(6): 635-642 / doi.org/ 10.1016/S1072-7515 (00)00758-4.
16. Tariq M, Moutaery AA, Arshaduddin M, Khan HA, Evans DP, Jacobs S. Fluconazole attenuates lung injury and mortality in a rat peritonitis model, Intensive Care Med 2003; 29(11): 2043-2049 / doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-1960-3.
17. Brocco MC, et al. Effects of peritoneal lavage with lidocaine on survival of rats with fecal. Acta Cir Bras 2008; 23(1): 42-47 / doi: 10.1590/s0102-86502008000100008.
18. Brocco MC, et al. Histological features of peritoneal lavage with ropivacaine in rats with fecal peritonitis. Acta Cir Bras 2012; 27(2): 193-199 / doi: 10.1590/s0102-86502012000200016.
19. Brocco MC, Nagib D, Paulo S, Florêncio J, Baptista DA, Carraretto AR. Effects of Peritoneal Lavage with Bupivacaine on Survival of Mice with Fecal Peritonitis. Rev Bras Anestesiol 2008; 58(5): 474-479 / doi: 10.1590/S0034-70942008000500005.
20. Weinstein WM, Onderdonk AB, Bartlett JG, Gorbach SL. Experimental Intra-Abdominal Abscesses in Rats: Development of an Experimental Model. Infect Immun 1974; 10(6): 1250-1205 / doi: 10.1128/iai.10.6.1250-1255.1974.
21. García Olmo D, et al. Physiopathology of paralytic ileus secondary to chemical peritonitis. Experimental study in dogs. Rev Es Enferm Apar Dig 1989; 76(4): 307-315.
22. Weledji EP. Perspectives on paralytic ileus. Acute Med Surg 2020; 7(1): e573 / doi: 10.1002/ams2. 573.
23. Schwarz NT, Beer-Stolz D, Simmons RL, Bauer AJ. Pathogenesis of paralytic ileus: intestinal manipulation opens a transient pathway between the intestinal lumen and the leukocytic infiltrate of the jejunal muscularis. Ann Surg 2002; 235(1): 31-40 / doi: 10.1097/00000658-200201000-00005.
24. Vather R, O’Grady, Bissett IP, Dinning PG. Postoperative ileus: mechanisms and future directions for research. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2014; 41(5): 358-370 / doi: 10.1111/1440-1681.12220.
25. Lubawski J, Saclarides T. Postoperative ileus: strategies for reduction. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2008; 4(5): 913-917 / doi: 10.2147/tcrm.s2390.
26. Harnsberger CR, Mayke JAl, K. Alavi K. Postoperative Ileus. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2019; 32(3): 166-170 / doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1677003.
27. Knightly JJ, Agostino D, Cliffton EE. The effect of fibrinolysin and heparin on the formation of peritoneal adhesions. Surgery 1962; 52: 250-258.
28. Kayaoglu HA, Ozkan N, Yenidogan E, Koseoglu RD. Effect of Antibiotic Lavage in Adhesion Prevention in Bacterial Peritonitis. Turkish J Trauma Emerg Surg 2013; 19(3): 189-194 / doi: 10.5505/ tjtes.2013.63444.
29. Topley N, Williams JD. Role of the peritoneal membrane in the control of inflammation in the peritoneal cavity. Kidney Int Suppl 1994; 48: S71-S78.
30. van Baal JOA, et al. The histophysiology and pathophysiology of the peritoneum, Tissue Cell 2017; 49(1): 95-105 / doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tice.2016.11.004.
31. Faull RJ. Peritoneal defenses against infection: winning the battle but losing the war? Semin Dial 2000; 13(1): 47-53 / doi: 10.1046/j.1525-139x.2000.00013.x.
32. Topley N, et al. Human peritoneal mesothelial cell prostaglandin synthesis: Induction of cyclooxygenase mRNA by peritoneal macrophage-derived cytokines. Kidney Int 1994; 46(3): 900-909 / doi.10.1038/ki.1994.348.
33. Jonjić N, et al. Expression of adhesion molecules and chemotactic cytokines in cultured human mesothelial cells., J Exp Med 1992; 176(4): 1165-1174 / doi: 10.1084/jem.176.4.1165.
34. Li FK, et al., “Leukocyte migration across human peritoneal mesothelial cells is dependent on directed chemokine secretion and ICAM-1 expression, Kidney Int 1998; 54(6): 2170-2183 / doi: doi.org/ 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1998.00174.x.
35. Mazar J, et al. CD40 ligand (CD154) takes part in regulation of the transition to mononuclear cell dominance during peritonitis, Kidney Int 2005; 67(4): 1340-1349 / doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00211.x.
36. Witowski J, Kawka E, Rudolf A, Jörres A. New Developments in Peritoneal Fibroblast Biology: Implications for Inflammation and Fibrosis in Peritoneal Dialysis, Biomed Res Int 2015; 2015: 134708 / doi: 10.1155/2015/134708.
37. Jasper CAJJ, Kieft H, Speelberg B, et al. Meropenem versus Cefuroxime plus Gentamicin for Treatment of Serious Infections in Elderly Patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1998; 42(5): 1233-1238 / doi:10.1128/AAC.42.5.1233.
38. Törnqvist A, Forsgrent A, Leandoer L , Ursing J. Antibiotic treatment during surgery for diffuse peritonitis: A prospective randomized study comparing the effects of cefuroxime and of a cefuroxime and metronidazole combination. Br J Surg 1985; 72(4): 261-264 / doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800720404.

Additional Files

Published

2023-03-31