EVALUATION OF DEMENTIA-TYPE COGNITIVE DECLINE THROUGH 18F-FDG PET-CT QUANTIFICATION AND CORRELATIONS OF THE MMSE TEST WITH FUNCTIONAL IMAGING BIOMARKERS

Authors

  • Roxana IACOB Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi
  • O. GHERASIM “Gh. Zane” Institute of Economic and Social Researche
  • Irena GRIEROSU Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi
  • R. STAMATE “Sf. Spiridon” County Clinical Emergency Hospital Iasi, Romania
  • V. GHIZDOVAT Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi
  • A.G. NAUM Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi
  • Cipriana STEFANESCU Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi

Abstract

Recognition of the given moment when a mild cognitive impairment (MCI) converts to Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) represents a turning point in the assessment of the mental status rate of decline, but is still insufficiently systematically studied. Our aim was to contribute to the identification of the dementia irreversible starting point by cognitive assessment test Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and correlating it with the hybrid imaging technique positron emission tomography (PET) with fluor-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) combined with localization computed tomography imaging (PET/CT), emphasizing that the method of quantification is crucial for patient evaluation and regression analysis can be helpful. Materials and methods: We studied 30 patients aged between 22 and 76 years presented during the assessment of their oncological pathologies. We evaluated their cognitive status by a MMSE test. All patients underwent a 18F-FDG PET/CT examination, the image acquisition including the brain region. After specific image processing, characteristic regions of interest (ROIs) were identified, maximum and mean standardized values (SUVmax and SUVmean) were extracted. We computed correlations between 17 variables including: age, MMSE score value, glycemia, Administered Radiopharmaceutical Dose, Uptake Period, SUVmax and SUVmean for numerous ROIs as cerebral (SUVmaxCC) and cerebellar cortex (SUVmaxCc), posterior cingulate gyrus (SUVmaxPCG) and precuneus (SUVmaxP), as well as two SUV ratios: SUVRPCG and SUVRP. Calculation of mean, minimum, maximum and standard deviation have been made for each variable, and calculation of 4 regression functions (linear, exponential, power and logarithmic) and unique correlation analysis have been made for each pair of variables. Results: MMSE tests identified values of over 24, with an average of 28.07 ± 1.5DS, all patients examined having a normal cognitive status. SUVmaxPCG had values between 5.1 and 21.3 g/mL, with an average of 13.36 ± 3.77DS, SUVmeanPCG between 4 and 13.2 g/mL, average 8.68±2.35DS, and SUVmaxP between 4.8 and 21 g/mL with an average of 13.06 ± 3.81DS, SUVmeanP between 4.1 and 14.1 g/mL with an average of 9.93±2.73DS. From the 34 strong and very strong linear and exponential correlations identified between SUVs of the studied ROIs, 7 correlations have “extremely strong” values (R>0.925) including SUVs of AD cerebral specific ROIs. Also, there is a mean linear correlation between Age and MMSE score (R=0.57). Conclusions: Quantitative evaluation of 18F-FDG PET-CT images for patients with neoplasia, found in a stage when an MCI can evolve simultaneously, could bring useful information for a possible early AD diagnostic and would be advisable in the precision medicine of the brain cognitive status evaluation.

Author Biographies

  • Roxana IACOB, Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi

    Faculty of Medicine / Biophysics and Medical Physics Division
    Regional Institute of Oncology, Iasi, Romania
    Nuclear Medicine Department

  • Irena GRIEROSU, Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi

    Faculty of Medicine / Biophysics and Medical Physics Division
    “Sf. Spiridon” County Clinical Emergency Hospital Iasi, Romania
    Nuclear Medicine Department

  • R. STAMATE, “Sf. Spiridon” County Clinical Emergency Hospital Iasi, Romania

    Nuclear Medicine Department

  • V. GHIZDOVAT, Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi

    Faculty of Medicine / Biophysics and Medical Physics Division

  • A.G. NAUM, Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi

    Faculty of Medicine / Biophysics and Medical Physics Division

  • Cipriana STEFANESCU, Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi

    Faculty of Medicine / Biophysics and Medical Physics Division
    “Sf. Spiridon” County Clinical Emergency Hospital Iasi, Romania
    Nuclear Medicine Department

References

1. World Health Organization. Risk Reduction of Cognitive Decline and Dementia: WHO Guidelines. Geneva, 2019.
2. Jack CR Jr, Bennett DA, Blennow K, et al. NIA-AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 2018; 14(4): 535-562.
3. Nobili F, Arbizu J, Bouwman F, et al. EANM-EAN Task Force for the Prescription of FDG-PET for Dementing Neurodegenerative Disorders. European Association of Nuclear Medicine and European Academy of Neurology recommendations for the use of brain (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in neurodegenerative cognitive impairment and dementia: Delphi consensus. Eur J Neurol 2018; 25(10): 1201-1217.
4. Mergenthaler P, Lindauer U, Dienel G, Meisel A. Sugar for the brain: the role of glucose in physiolog-ical and pathological brain function. Trends Neurosci 2013; 36(10): 587-597.
5. Butterfield DA, Halliwell B. Oxidative stress, dysfunctional glucose metabolism and Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Neurosci 2019; 20(3): 148-160.
6. Frisoni GB, Boccardi M, Barkhof F, et al. Strategic roadmap for an early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease based on biomarkers. Lancet Neurol 2017; 16(8): 661-676.
7. Mainta IC, Perani D, Delattre BM, et al. FDG PET/MR Imaging in Major Neurocognitive Disorders. Curr Alzheimer Res 2017; 14(2): 186-197.
8. Shimizu S, Hirose D, Hatanaka H, et al. Role of Neuroimaging as a Biomarker for Neurodegenera-tive Diseases. Front Neurol 2018; 9: 265.
9. Sanchez-Catasus CA, Stormezand GN, van Laar PJ, De Deyn PP, Sanchez MA, Dierckx RA. FDG-PET for Prediction of AD Dementia in Mild Cognitive Impairment. A Review of the State of the Art with Particular Emphasis on the Comparison with Other Neuroimaging Modalities (MRI and Perfusion SPECT). Curr Alzheimer Res 2017; 14(2): 127-142.
10. Ricci M, Cimini A, Chiaravalloti A, Filippi L, Schillaci O. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and Neuroimaging in the Personalized Approach to Neuro-degenerative Causes of Dementia. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21(20): 7481.
11. Pagani M, Nobili F, Morbelli S, et al. Early identification of MCI converting to AD: a DG PET study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2017; 44: 2042-2052.
12. Fernández-Blázquez MA, Ávila-Villanueva M, Maestú F, Medina M. Specific Features of Subjective Cognitive Decline Predict Faster Conversion to Mild Cognitive Impairment. J Alzheimers Dis 2016; 52(1): 271-281.
13. Qu Z, Zhang J, Yang H, et al. Protective effect of tetrahydropalmatine against d-galactose induced memory impairment in rat. Physiol Behav 2016; 154: 114-125.
14. Creavin S, Wisniewski S, Noel-Storr A, et al. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) for the Detec-tion of Dementia in Clinically Unevaluated People Aged 65 and Over in Community and Primary Care Populations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; (1): CD011145.
15. Varrone A, Asenbaum S, Vander Borght T, et al. EANM procedure guidelines for PET brain imaging using (18F)FDG, version 2. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009; 36(12): 2103-2110.
16. Schoen M, Braun T, Manava P, Ludwigs S, Lell M. Influence of scan time point and volume of intra-venous contrast administration on blood-pool and liver SUVmax and SUVmean in (18F) FDG PET/CT. Nuklearmedizin 2018; 57(2): 50-55.
17. Iacob R, Ștefănescu C. Cognitive decline status on highly educated persons – a pilot correlational study. In: Identity and Dialogue in the Era of Globalization, Iulian Boldea I, Sigmirean C (ed.) Târgu-Mureș Arhipelag XXI Press, 2019, 21-31.
18. Gherasim O, Iacob R. Fuzzy assessments for economic indicators. In Romanian Rural Tourism in International Context. Present and Prospects. Iaşi: Performantica 2017; XLIII (IV): 216-221.
19. Minoshima S, Frey KA, Koeppe RA, Foster NL, Kuhl DE. A diagnostic approach in Alzheimer’s disease using threedimensional stereotactic surface projections of fluorine-18-FDG PET. J Nucl Med 1995; 36(7): 1238-1248.
20. De Carli F, Nobili F, Pagani M, et al. Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Accuracy and generalization capability of an automatic method for the detection of typical brain hypometabolism in prodromal Alzheimer disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019; 46(2): 334-347.
21. Pan X, Phan T-L, Adel M, et al. Multi-View Separable Pyramid Network for AD Prediction at MCI Stage by 18 FFDG Brain PET Imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2021; 40(1): 81-92.
22. Sörensen A, Blazhenets G, Rücker G, Schiller F, Meyer PT, Frings L. Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroim-aging Initiative. Prognosis of conversion of mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s dementia by voxel-wise Cox regression based on FDG PET data. Neuroimage Clin 2019; 21: 101637.
23. Duan J, Liu Y, Wu H, Wang J, Chen L, Chen CLP. Broad learning for early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease using FDG-PET of the brain. Front Neurosci 2023; 17: 1137567.
24. Sprinz C, Altmayer S, Zanon M, et al. Effects of blood glucose level on 18F-FDG uptake for PET/CT in normal organs: A systematic review. PLoS One 2018; 13(2): e0193140.

Additional Files

Published

2024-06-28