THE ACCURACY OF AI-ASSISTED IMAGING DIAGNOSIS VERSUS CONVENTIONAL EVALUATION OF DENTAL PROFESSIONALS

Authors

  • Oana BUTNARU ‟Grigore Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iași
  • Diana TATARCIUC ‟Grigore Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iași
  • F. C. BIDA ‟Grigore Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iași
  • Carina BALCOS ‟Grigore Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iași
  • V. CONSTANTIN ‟Grigore Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iași
  • C. COJOCARU ‟Grigore Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iași
  • Teona TUDORICI ‟Grigore Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iași
  • G. ROTUNDU ‟Grigore Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iași
  • Ana SIRGHE ‟Grigore Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iași
  • Danisia HABA ‟Grigore Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iași

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22551/3qash186

Abstract

The accurate detection of dental caries is crucial for effective treatment planning and prevention of disease progression. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a valuable tool in odonto-periodontal imaging, offering potential improvements in diagnostic accuracy compared to traditional methods employed by dental professionals. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of AI-assisted odonto-periodontal imaging in detecting dental caries with diagnoses established by general dentists, specialists, and senior specialists. Materials and methods: A comparative analytical study was conducted on a sample of 60 dentists categorized into three professional groups-general dentists, specialists, and senior specialists-alongside AI diagnostics using the Planmeca Romexis platform. Results: High-quality panoramic radiographs (OPG) representing various carious lesions were analyzed independently by all participants. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 26.0, employing chi-square and ANOVA tests to assess differences among groups. Senior specialists and AI reported the highest number of detected lesions, with AI demonstrating a lower standard deviation, indicating greater consistency. The ANOVA test confirmed significant differences in caries detection across groups (F=18.849, p<.001), highlighting the superior diagnostic performance of AI. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the significant advantages of AI-assisted diagnostic tools in dental-periodontal imaging, particularly in the detection of carious lesions

Author Biographies

  • Oana BUTNARU, ‟Grigore Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iași

    Faculty of Dental Medicine,
    Department of Biophysics 

  • Diana TATARCIUC, ‟Grigore Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iași

    Faculty of Dental Medicine,
    Department of Biophysics 

  • F. C. BIDA, ‟Grigore Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iași

    Faculty of Dental Medicine,
    Department of Implantology, Removable Prostheses 

  • Carina BALCOS, ‟Grigore Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iași

    Faculty of Dental Medicine,
    Department of Oral Health

  • V. CONSTANTIN, ‟Grigore Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iași

    Faculty of Dental Medicine,
    Department of Total Prostheses

  • C. COJOCARU, ‟Grigore Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iași

    Faculty of Dental Medicine,
    Department of Total Prostheses

  • Teona TUDORICI, ‟Grigore Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iași

    Faculty of Dental Medicine,
    Department of Total Prostheses

  • G. ROTUNDU, ‟Grigore Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iași

    Faculty of Dental Medicine,
    Department of Periodontology 

  • Ana SIRGHE, ‟Grigore Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iași

    Faculty of Dental Medicine,
    Department of Pediatric Dentistry 

  • Danisia HABA, ‟Grigore Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iași

    Faculty of Dental Medicine,
    Department of Dental Radiology 

References

1. Alharbi SS, Alhasson HF. Exploring the Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Dental Image De-tection: A Systematic Review. Diagnostics 2024; 14(21): 2442.

2. Topol EJ. High-performance medicine: The convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat Med 2019; 25: 44-56.

3. Schwendicke F, Golla T, Dreher M, Krois J. Convolutional neural networks for dental image diagnos-tics: A scoping review. J Dent 2019; 91: 103226.

4. Muramatsu C, Morishita T, Takahashi R, et al. Tooth detection and classification on panoramic radi-ographs for automatic dental chart filing: Improved classification by multi-sized input data. Oral Radiol 2021; 37: 13-19.

5. Başaran M, Çelik Ö, Bayrakdar I.S, et al. Diagnostic charting of panoramic radiography using deep-learning artificial intelligence system. Oral Radiol 2021; 38: 363-369.

6. Forouzeshfar P, Safaei A.A, Ghaderi F, et al. Dental cavities diagnosis using neural networks and deep learning: A systematic review. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2024; 83:30423-30466.

7. Kühnisch J, Meyer O, Hesenius M, Hickel R, Gruhn V. Cavities Detection on Intraoral Images Using Artificial Intelligence. J Dent Res. 2022 Feb;101(2):158-165.

8. Gimenez T, Piovesan C, Braga MM, et al. Visual inspection for cavities detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res 2015; 94(7): 895-904.

9. Litzenburger F, Heck K, Pitchika V, et al. Inter-and intraexaminer reliability of bitewing radiography and near-infrared light transillumination for proximal cavities detection and assessment. Dentomaxil-lofac Radiol 2018; 47(3): 20170292.

10. Schwendicke F, Samek W, Krois J. Artificial intelligence in dentistry: chances and challenges. J Dent Res 2020; 99(7): 769-774.

11. Naeimi SM, Darvish S, Salman BN, Luchian I. Artificial Intelligence in Adult and Pediatric Dentistry: A Narrative Review. Bioengineering. 2024; 11(5):431

12. Cantu AG, Gehrung S, Krois J, et al Detecting cavities lesions of different radiographic extension on bitewings using deep learning. J Dent.2020; 100:103425.

13. Budală DG, Surlari Z,Bida FC, Ciocan-Pendefunda AA, Agop -Forna D. Digital instruments in den-tistry-back to the future. Romanian Journal of Oral Rehab 2023; 15(2): 310-318.

14. Khan HA, Haider MA, Ansari HA, et al. Automated feature detection in dental periapical radiographs by using deep learning. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2020; 131(6): 711-720.

15. Khanagar SB, Alfouzan K, Awawdeh M, Alkadi L, Albalawi F, Alfadley A. Application and Perfor-mance of Artificial Intelligence Technology in Detection, Diagnosis and Prediction of Dental Caries (DC)A Systematic Review. Diagnostics 2022; 12(5): 1083.

16. Al-Khalifa KS, Ahmed WM, Azhari AA, et al. The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Caries Detection: A Review. Bioengineering 2024; 11(9): 936.

17. Frenkel E, Neumayr J, Schwarzmaier J, et al. Caries Detection and Classification in Photographs Using an Artificial Intelligence-Based Model-An External Validation Study. Diagnostics 2024; 14(20): 2281.

18. Surlari Z, Budală DG, Lupu CI, Stelea CG, Butnaru OM, Luchian I. Current Progress and Challenges of Using Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Dentistry-A Narrative Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine 2023; 12(23): 7378.

19. Geetha V, Aprameya KS, Hinduja DM. Dental cavities diagnosis in digital radiographs using back-propagation neural network. Health Inf Sci Syst 2020; 8(1): 8.

20. Askar H, Krois J, Rohrer C, et al. Detecting white spot lesions on dental photography using deep learning: a pilot study. J Dent 2021; 107: 103615.

21. Surdu A, Budala DG, Luchian I, Foia LG, Botnariu GE, Scutariu MM. Using AI in Optimizing Oral and Dental Diagnosis-A Narrative Review. Diagnostics 2024; 14(24): 2804.

Additional Files

Published

2025-04-07