KEY FACTORS FOR MINI-IMPLANT SUCCESS: THE CRITICAL ROLE OF CORTICAL BONE THICKNESS AND ORTHODONTIC FORCES IN ENHANCING STABILITY AND PREVENTING FAILURE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22551/en3hew52Abstract
This study aims to analyze the biomechanical performance of titanium (Ti6Al4V) mini-implants (MIs) under orthodontic forces using finite element analysis (FEA) and to evaluate stress, strain, and displacement behavior within cortical and spongy bone under realistic clinical conditions. Materials and methods: A three-dimensional finite element model of a mini-implant (2.0 mm diameter, 12 mm length) was developed using CT-based reconstruction of the mandible and periodontal ligament. The model was meshed with tetrahedral elements and simulated in ANSYS Workbench 19.2. Material properties for bones, teeth, ligament, and implant were defined as linear elastic, homogeneous, and isotropic. Orthodontic forces of 2N and 10N were applied at a 30° angle to replicate molar intrusion scenarios. Stress, strain, and displacement distributions were analyzed for cortical and spongy bone, with special attention to localized areas of maximum impact. Results: Maximum von Mises stress and equivalent strain values were localized around the implant insertion site. Cortical and spongy bone demonstrated high resistance to applied forces, with stress and strain levels remaining below their fracture thresholds. The results highlighted the critical role of cortical bone thickness in ensuring primary stability. Displacement was minimal, with a maximum value of 0.028948 mm at the implant head under a 2N force, demonstrating functional stability. Forces exceeding 3N were identified as the threshold for potential spongy bone failure, reinforcing the appropriateness of 2N for orthodontic applications. Conclusions: The study confirms that mini-implants can effectively withstand orthodontic forces when inserted into adequate cortical bone thickness. The integration of finite element modeling with clinical insights provides valuable guidance for optimizing mini-implant performance and minimizing adverse effects. These findings contribute to improving treatment strategies and ensuring the longevity of orthodontic anchorage systems.
References
1. Filipová D, Filipi V, Kamínek M. Proclination-induced changes in the labial cortical bone thickness of lower incisors. Bratislava Medical Journal 2019; 120(2): 155-160.
2. Kovuru V. Factorial analysis of variables affecting bone stress adjacent to mini-implants used for molar distalization by direct anchorage-a finite element study. Journal of Orthodontic Science 2023; 12(1): 18.
3. Son E, Kim S, Hong C, et al. A study on the morphologic change of palatal alveolar bone shape after intrusion and retraction of maxillary incisors. Scientific Reports 2020; 10(1): 14454
4. Thongudomporn U, Charoemratrote C, Jearapongpakorn S. Changes of anterior maxillary alveolar bone thickness following incisor proclination and extrusion. The Angle Orthodontist 2014; 85(4): 549-554.
5. Pan C, Liu P, Tseng Y, Chou S, Wu C, Chang H. Effects of cortical bone thickness and trabecular bone density on primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants. Journal of Dental Sciences 2019; 14(4): 383-388.
6. Yu W, Tsai M, Yu J, Huang H, Hsu J. Bone quality affects stability of orthodontic miniscrews. Scientific Reports 2022; 12(1): 2849.
7. Centeno ACT, Fensterseifer CK, Chami VO, Ferreira ES, Marquezan M, Ferrazzo VA. Correlation between cortical bone thickness at mini-implant insertion sites and age of patient. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics 2022; 27(1): e222098
8. Marquezan M, Mattos C, Sant’Anna E, Souza M, Maia L. Does cortical thickness influence the primary stability of miniscrews? a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Angle Orthodontist 2014; 84(6): 1093-1103.
9. Malik F, Khan F, Ali S, Rana F, Haq H, Hussain M. Factors affecting success and failure of orthodontic mini-implants: a retrospective review. Prof Med J 2023; 30(02): 285-291.
10. Hatia A, Doldo T, Parrini S, et al. Accuracy and Completeness of ChatGPT-Generated Information on Interceptive Orthodontics: A Multicenter Collaborative Study. J Clin Med 2024; 13(3): 735.
11. Sant’Anna EF, Araújo MTS, Nojima LI, Cunha ACD, Silveira BLD, Marquezan M. High-intensity laser application in Orthodontics. Dental Press J Orthod 2017; 22(6): 99-109.
12. Weir T. Clear aligners in orthodontic treatment. Aust Dent J 2017; 62(Suppl 1): 58-62.
13. Popa A, Dehelean C, Călniceanu H, Watz C, Brad S, Sinescu C, Szuhanek C. A custom-made orthodontic mini-implant-effect of insertion angle and cortical bone thickness on stress distribution with a complex in vitro and in vivo biosafety profile. Materials 2020; 13(21): 4789.
14. Rito-Macedo F, Barroso-Oliveira M, Paranhos L, et al. Implant insertion angle and depth: peri-implant bone stress analysis by the finite element method. J Clin Exp Dent 2021; 10: 1167-1173.
15. Panaite T, Savin C, Olteanu ND, et al. Heat treatment’s vital role: elevating orthodontic mini-implants for superior performance and longevity-pilot study. Dent J 2024; 12(4): 103.
16. Cozzani M, Pasini M, Zallio F, et al. Comparison of maxillary molar distalization with an implant-supported distal jet and a traditional tooth-supported distal jet appliance. Int J Dent 2014; 10(1): 1-7.
17. Choi S, Kim S, Lee K, Sung S, Chun Y, Hwang C. Stress distributions in peri-mini screw areas from cylindrical and tapered miniscrews inserted at different angles. Korean J Orthod 2016; 46(4): 189.
18. Sivamurthy G, Sundari S. Stress distribution patterns at mini-implant site during retraction and intrusion-a three-dimensional finite element study. Prog Orthod 2016; 17: 4.
19. Yamashita E. Effects of improper mechanical force on the production of sonic hedgehog, rankle, and il-6 in human periodontal ligament cells in vitro. Dent J 2024; 12(4): 108.
20. Wang W, Li N, Zhao Y, Wu H, Wang M, Chen X. Effect of stretch frequency on osteogenesis of perio-dontium during periodontal ligament distraction. Orthod Craniofac Res 2022; 26(1): 53-61.
21. Li, M, Zhang, C, Yang, Y. Effects of mechanical forces on osteogenesis and osteoclast genesis in human periodontal ligament fibroblasts. Bone Joint Res 2019; 8(1): 19-31.
22. Feller, L, Schechter, I, Thomadakis, G, Fourie, J, Lemmer, J. Biological events in periodontal ligament and alveolar bone associated with application of orthodontic forces. Sci World J 2015; 2015: 876509.
23. Mascarenhas R, Chatra L, Shenoy S, Husain A, Mathew J, Parveen S. A comparative study of forces in labial and lingual orthodontics using finite element method. The Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society 2015; 49(1): 15-18.
24. Bori E, Innocenti B. Development and validation of an in-silico virtual testing rig for analyzing total knee arthroplasty performance during passive deep flexion: a feasibility study. Medical Engineering & Physics 2020; 84: 21-27.
25. Cicciù M. Bioengineering methods of analysis and medical devices: a current trends and state of the art. Materials 2020; 13(3): 797.
26. Klein C. P, van der Waerden, J. The effect of osseointegration on the mechanical stability of dental implants: A finite element analysis. Journal of Biomechanics 2015; 48(1): 1-7.
27. Haghighi A, Pouyafar V, Navid A, et al. Investigation of the optimal design of orthodontic mini-implants based on the primary stability: a finite element analysis. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2019; 13(2): 85-89.
28. Shim Y. Dental implants in patients with gingival oral lichen planus. J Oral Med Pain 2019; 44(3): 77-82.
29. Rues S, Schmitter M, Kappel S, et al. Effect of bone quality and quantity on the primary stability of dental implants in a simulated bicortical placement. Clin Oral Investig 2020; 25(3): 1265-1272.
30. Motoyoshi M, Inaba M, Ono A, Ueno I, et al. The effect of cortical bone thickness on the stability of orthodontic mini-implants and on the stress distribution in surrounding bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 38(1):13-18.
31. Holm L, Cunningham S, Petrie A, Cousley R. An in vitro study of factors affecting the primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants. Angle Orthod 2012; 82(6):1022-1028.
32. Motoyoshi M, Inaba M, Ono A, Ueno I, et al. The effect of cortical bone thickness on the stability of orthodontic mini-implants and on the stress distribution in surrounding bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 38(1): 13-18.
33. Holm L, Cunningham S, Petrie A, Cousley R. An in vitro study of factors affecting the primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants. Angle Orthod 2012; 82(6): 1022-1028.
34. Wilmes B, Ottenstreuer S, Su Y, Drescher D. Impact of implant design on primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants. J Orofac Orthop 2008; 69(1): 42-50.
35. Sawada K, Nakahara K, Matsunaga S, et al. Evaluation of cortical bone thickness and root proximity at maxillary interradicular sites for mini‐implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 24(10):1-7.
36. Barros SE, Vanz V, Chiqueto K, et al. Mechanical strength of stainless steel and titanium alloy mini-implants with different diameters: an experimental laboratory study. Acta Odontol Latinoam 2021; 34(1): 27-34.
37. Ghorab H. Finite element study to evaluate the stress around mini-implant during canine retraction using continuous and interrupted orthodontic forces. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences 2023; 11(D): 36-43 / doi: 10.3889/oamjms. 2023.11122
38. Chatzigianni A, Keilig L, Reimann S, et al. Effect of mini-implant length and diameter on primary stability under loading with two force levels. European J Orthod 2010; 33(4): 381-387.
39. Hirai Y, Watanabe K, Deguchi T, Ueda K, Hamada K, Tanaka E. Influence of insertion depth on stress distribution in orthodontic miniscrews and the surrounding bone by finite element analysis. Dental Ma-terials Journal 2021; 40(5): 1270-1276 / doi: 10.4012/ dmj.2020-400.
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Medical-Surgical Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
COPYRIGHT
Once an article is accepted for publication, MSJ requests a transfer of copyrights for published articles.
COPYRIGHT TRANSFER FORM FOR
REVISTA MEDICO-CHIRURGICALĂ A SOCIETĂȚII DE MEDICI ȘI NATURALIȘTI DIN IAȘI /
THE MEDICAL-SURGICAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF PHYSICIANS AND NATURALISTS FROM IASI
We, the undersigned authors of the manuscript entitled
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
warrant that this manuscript, which is submitted for publication in the REVISTA MEDICO-CHIRURGICALĂ, has not been published and it is not under consideration for publication in another journal.
- we give the consent for publication in the REVISTA MEDICO-CHIRURGICALĂ, in printed and electronic format and we transfer unconditioned and complete the copyright of this manuscript to the REVISTA MEDICO-CHIRURGICALĂ, in the event of its acceptance.
- the manuscript does not break the intellectual property rights of any other person.
- we have read the submitted version of the manuscript and we are fully responsible for the content.
Names and signatures of authors / copyright owners (the following sequence is the authorship of the article):
- ______________________________/_________________________
- ______________________________/_________________________
- ______________________________/_________________________
N.B. All the authors must sign this form
