A QUALITATIVE STUDY ON THE CAUSES OF MEDICAL MALPRACTICE COMPLAINTS

Authors

  • Beatrice-Gabriela IOAN ‟Grigore Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iași
  • R. V. VORONEANU-POPA ‟Grigore Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iași

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22551/9dgzjc10

Abstract

Medical malpractice complaints represent a genuine challenge for both medical and legal scholars. In recent years, there has been a notable increase in the number of complaints filed against physicians for alleged acts of medical malpractice. Materials and methods: To achieve our objective, we conducted a qualitative study in which data were collected through semi-structured interviews. The participants in our study were lawyers with experience in handling medical malpractice cases. Results: A total of 14 lawyers participated in the study. Thematic analysis of the collected data led to the identification of 9 main themes and 21 subthemes. The central focus of this article is the investigation of the causes underlying medical malpractice complaints. According to the lawyers interviewed, these causes include dysfunctions in the physician-patient relationship, professional errors, and systemic shortcomings. Conclusions: Our research indicates that the reasons behind medical malpractice complaints are multifaceted. The results of this study may serve as a foundation for developing strategies aimed at reducing the number of malpractice complaints in the healthcare sector.

Author Biographies

  • Beatrice-Gabriela IOAN, ‟Grigore Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iași

    Faculty of Medicine
    Department of Medical Specialties (III) / Legal Medicine 

  • R. V. VORONEANU-POPA, ‟Grigore Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iași

    Ph.D. Student, Doctoral School

References

1. Kucher VO. Judicial method of protecting patients’ rights. Uzhh Natl Univ Herald Law Ser 2025; 2(86): 146-151.

2. Putra KAPD, Purwani SPM, Fitriyastanti D, Anitasari S. Education for Medical Personnel Malpractice: A Literature review. J Penelit Pendidik IPA 2023; 9(9): 521-530 / doi: 10.29 303/jppipa.v9i9.4360

3. Muttaqin MNAZ, Amelia RA. Review of Vulnerability Theory on Patients’ rights in medical Mal-practice cases. Int J Law Dyn Rev 2024; 2(2): 111-120 / doi: 10.62039/ ijldr.v 2i2.52

4. Baghdadabad FH, Montazeralfaraj R, Zarezadeh M, Keyghobady N. Causes of health providers’ malpractices in records referred to Forensic Medicine Organization in Yazd. Q J Manag Strateg Health Syst 2023; 8(1) / doi: 10.18502/mshsj.v8i1.12889

5. Sadr SS, Ghadyani MH, Avish S, Ramim T. Medical malpractice frequency in the psychiatric field, in Medical Council of Iran, from 2001 to 2010: A brief report. Tehran Univ Med J 2014; 72(5): 329-334.

6. Flannery F, Parikh P, Oetgen W. Characteristics of Medical Professional Liability Claims in Patients Treated by Family Medicine Physicians. J Am Board Fam Med 2010; 23(6): 753-761 / doi: 10.3122/ jabfm.2010.06.100056

7. Meredith V, Cook CB, Penman A. Use of the Physician Insurers Association of America database as a surveillance tool for diabetes - related malpractice claims in the U.S. Diabetes Care 1998; 21(7): 1096-1100 / doi: 10.2337/diacare.21.7.1096

8. Levinson W, Roter D, Mullooly J, Dull V, Frankel R. Physician-Patient Communication. The Rela-tionship with Malpractice Claims Among Primary Care Physicians and Surgeons. JAMA 1997; 277(7): 553-559 / doi: 10.1001/jama.1997.03540310051034.

9. Huntington B, Kuhn N. Communication Gaffes: A root cause of malpractice claims. Proc Bayl Univ Med Cent, 2003; 16(2): 157-161 / doi: 10.1080/08998280.2003.11927898.

10. Roter D. The patient-physician relationship and its implications for malpractice litigation. J Health Care Law Policy 2006; 9(2): 304-314.

11. Hickson GB, Jenkins DA. Identifying and addressing communication failures as a means of reducing unnecessary malpractice claims. NC Med J 2007; 68(5): 363-364.

12. Schleiter KE. Difficult Patient-Physician Relationships and the Risk of Medical Malpractice Litigation. Ama J Ethics. 2009; 11(3): 242-246.

13. Mostafapour M, Smith J, Fortier JH. Garber G. E., Beyond medical errors: exploring the interpersonal dynamics in physician-patient relationships linked to medico-legal complaints. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24: 1-11.

14. Wallace E, Lowry J, Smith SM. Fahey T. The epidemiology of malpractice claims in primary care: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2013; 3(7): 1-8 / doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013- 002929

15. Tarakcioglu ZE, Ozdemir B, Sutasir MN. Evaluation of problems arising in emergency services from the perspectives of medical and criminal law: the example of Turkey. Heliyon 2024; 8440(24): 1-26 / doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon. 2024.e39492.

16. Wong KE, Parikh PD, Miller KC, Zonfrillo MR. Emergency Department and Urgent Care Medical Malpractice Claims 2001-15. West J Emerg Med 2021; 22(2): 333-338 / doi: 10. 5811/westjem.2020. 9.48845

17. Chern CH, Want LM, How CK. Exploration of clinically significant adverse events in adult non-traumatic emergency department discharged patients through the basic management process analysis - A five-year experience. J Acute Med 2012; 2(1): 19-25 / doi: 10.1016 /j.jacme.2012.03.001

18. Flood CM, Thomas B. Canadian Medical Malpractice Law in 2011: Missing the mark on patient safety. Chi Kent L Rev 2011; 86(3): 1053-1092.

19. Dalli J. Ending violence against doctors in China. Lancet 2012; 379(9828): 1764 / doi: 10.1016/S0140- 6736(12)60729-6.

20. Li H, Wu X, Sun T, Li L, et al. Claims, liabilities, injures and compensation payments of medical malpractice litigation cases in China from 1998 to 2011. Health Serv Res 2014; 14(1): 390 / doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-390

21. Mello MM, Brennan TA. Deterrence to medical errors: theory and evidence for malpractice reform. Tex L Rev 2002; 80(7): 1595-1637.

22. Runciman WB, Merry AF, Wheatland FT. Error, blame and the law in health care - an antipodean perspective. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138(12): 974-980.

Additional Files

Published

2025-07-08

Issue

Section

INTERNAL MEDICINE - PEDIATRICS