MEDICINAL LEECH THERAPY IN DIGITAL REPLANTATION

Authors

  • A. AMARANDEI “Sf. Spiridon” County Clinical Emergency Hospital Iasi
  • Andra-Irina BULGARU ILIESCU “Sf. Spiridon” County Clinical Emergency Hospital Iasi
  • M. BENAMOR “Sf. Spiridon” County Clinical Emergency Hospital Iasi, Romania
  • D. C. MORARU “Sf. Spiridon” County Clinical Emergency Hospital Iasi, Romania
  • V. POROCH ‟Grigore Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iași
  • Mihaela PERTEA “Sf. Spiridon” County Clinical Emergency Hospital Iasi, Romania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22551/qx9da432

Abstract

Venous congestion represent a complication in reconstructive microsurgery, particularly in digital replantation and revascularization procedures, where achieving venous outflow may be technically impossible. In these cases, medicinal leech therapy (MLT) offers a biologically active method to decompress congested tissues and improve tissue survival. Material and methods: The study included a group of 35 patients that was used treated with MLT for venous congestion following digital replantation. Key variables included timing of therapy initiation, treatment duration, leech application frequency, complications, and salvage outcomes. Additionally, we conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar for studies published between January 2014 and March 2024. Following PRISMA guidelines, we included case reports, series, and clinical studies reporting MLT use in digital replantation or revascularization. Results: Our cohort achieved an overall tissue salvage rate of 88.6% (31 of 35 cases), with four failures due to arterial injury. From 134 identified records, 10 studies met inclusion criteria. In the literature, MLT was started within 24-48 hours of congestion onset, lasting 4-7 days, with 2-5 leeches applied daily at 2-4-hour intervals. Reported salvage rates ranged from 66% to 85%. Complications included Aeromonas hydrophila infections and anemia requiring transfusion. Conclusions: MLT remains an effective, evidence-supported adjunct for venous congestion management after digital replantation, particularly when venous anastomoses are not feasible. A standardized protocol based on recent data may improve outcomes and safety in microsurgery.

Author Biographies

  • A. AMARANDEI, “Sf. Spiridon” County Clinical Emergency Hospital Iasi

    Department of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery

  • Andra-Irina BULGARU ILIESCU, “Sf. Spiridon” County Clinical Emergency Hospital Iasi

    Department of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery
    “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania

  • M. BENAMOR, “Sf. Spiridon” County Clinical Emergency Hospital Iasi, Romania

    Department of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery

  • D. C. MORARU, “Sf. Spiridon” County Clinical Emergency Hospital Iasi, Romania

    Department of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery
    “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania

  • V. POROCH, ‟Grigore Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iași

    Regional Institute of Oncology Iasi, Romania / Department of Palliative Care

  • Mihaela PERTEA, “Sf. Spiridon” County Clinical Emergency Hospital Iasi, Romania

    Department of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery
    “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania

References

1. Lalonde DH. Wide-awake hand surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115(4): 987-990.

2. Foucher G, Braun FM, Merle M. Zone I replantation: venous drainage via leeches. J Hand Surg 1983; 8(4): 387-393.

3. Gordon CR, Parnes N, Khosla RK, Huang TT. Pediatric leech therapy in traumatic ear avulsion. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120(1): 210-213.

4. Kose A, Arslan ED, Bozkurt M, Satar S. Strategies for anemia in MLT: transfusion thresholds. Trans-fus Med. 2015; 25(1): 50-54.

5. Cornejo A, Shammas RL, Poveromo L, Suver D, Johnson S, Witek C, et al. Institutional outcomes of leech therapy for venous congestion. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33(6): 426-432.

6. Herlin C, Bertheuil N, Bekara F, et al. Leech therapy in flap salvage: systematic review and practical recommendations. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2016; 61(4): 307-313.

7. Pickrell BB, Daly MC, Freniere B, Anthony JP. Leech therapy following digital replantation and revascularization. J Hand Surg Am 2020; 45(8): 728-734.

8. Halilagic A, Mujic J, et al. Leech therapy in chronic wounds: a case-based review. Front Med (Lau-sanne). 2024; 11: 1417041.

9. Green PA, Shafritz AB. Medicinal leech use in microsurgery. J Hand Surg Am. 2010; 35(6): 1015-1017.

10. Spear M. Medicinal leech therapy: friend or foe. Plast Surg Nurs 2016; 36(2): 72-74.

11. Herlin C, Sinna R. Leech therapy protocol optimization. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2016; 61(4): 312-318.

12. Baudet J, Fasel J, Laborde F. Distal digital replantation and leech use. Plast Reconstr Surg 1981; 68(2): 232-236.

13. Mumcuoglu KY. Recommendations for the use of leeches in reconstructive plastic surgery. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2014; 2014: 205929.

14. Elmi Terander A, et al. Medicinal Leech Therapy in Reconstructive and Microsurgery: A Review. MMJ 2017; 27(1): 38-43.

15. Brito M et al. The Use of Leech Therapy in Reconstructive Surgery: A Review of the Literature. Oxf J Aesthet Educ 2022; 6(1): 67-74.

16. Horoz L, Cakmak MF. Leech therapy for venous congestion in digit replants: a review. Int J Clin Exp Med 2023; 16(2): 11345-11351.

17. Giltay EJ, et al. Leech Therapy in Reconstructive Surgery: A 10-Year Retrospective Review. Eur J Plast Surg 2012; 35: 229-233

18. Schulz C, Schmidt W, et al. Hirudotherapy in clinical practice. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2019; 116(16): 267-273

19. Rasooli S, et al. Cutaneous Complications of Medicinal Leech Therapy. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2016; 30(10): 1753-1758.

20. Streit L, Dvorak Z, Hajek M. Leech Therapy in Pediatric Fingertip Replant. Acta Chir Plast 2015; 56(3): 96-98.

21. Whitaker IS, Rao J, Izadi D, Butler PE. Historical and Clinical Overview of Hirudotherapy. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011; 64(9): 1260-1267.

22. Tarazjamshidi M, Bagheri F, Dehghani R. Leech therapy in nearly total finger amputation. J Wound Med 2014; 3(2): 85-88.

23. K Seitz IA, et al. Medicinal Leeches in Reconstructive Surgery-Current Applications and Results. Transylv Plast Dent 2012; 37(2): 154-158.

24. Wassmer T, Moellinger A, Fiedler T, et al. Increasing multidrug resistance in leech-borne Aeromonas isolates. Clin Infect Dis 2020; 71(5): 1208-1214.

25. Zamora IJ, Pollack SV, Pineda M, et al. Hirudotherapy for digit replantation: a review. Ann Biol Clin 2014; 10(2): 252-257.

26. Lee ZH, Cohen JM, Daar DA, Levin LS, Thanik VD, Warren SM. Quantifying outcomes for leech therapy in digit revascularization and replantation. J Hand Surg Am 2019; 44(6): 497.e1-497.e7.

27. Tuncel U, Tanrikulu R, Guler E, et al. Successful salvage of congested fingertip replant with medicinal leeches: a case report. Gazi Med J 2021; 7: e2555

28. Moghadam M, Doroodgar M, Ramezani M, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Aeromonas spp. isolated from medicinal leeches. J Clin Med 2024; 13(4): 1243.

29. Whitaker IS, Oboumarzouk O, Rozen WM, et al. The efficacy of medicinal leeches in plastic and reconstructive surgery: a systematic review. Microsurgery 2012; 32(3): 240-246.

30. Wilkinson H, et al. Use of Medicinal Leeches in Digit Replantation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 69(6): 1686-1692.

31. Arami A, Gurevitz S, Palti R, et al. Use of medicinal leeches for venous congestion in replanted or revascularized digits. J Hand Surg Am 2018; 43(5): 459.e1-459.e6.

32. Abdelrahman M, Abu-Sheasha G, et al. Medicinal leech therapy: modern perspectives and clinical practice. Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2021; 28(3): 141-146.

33. Halilagic A, Abdulahovic A, et al. Emerging insights into leech therapy in wound management. Front Med (Lausanne) 2024; 11: 1417041

34. Tran R, Mahmoud A, et al. The role of leech therapy in modern reconstructive procedures. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2021; 55(2): 101-106.

35. Pertea M, Ciobanu P, Velenciuc N, et al. Utility of “reposition-flap” in the reconstruction of the avulsed thumb. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100(38): e27290.

Additional Files

Published

2025-07-08