VALIDATION AND ADAPTATION TO THE ROMANIAN LANGUAGE AND POPULATION OF THE EBBCAM SCALE OF PERCEIVED COMPETENCE IN THE FACE OF DEATH, IN NURSING AND MEDICAL STUDENTS

Authors

  • Adeline-Alexandra BĂIȘANU-ȚINTILĂ Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania
  • V. POROCH Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania
  • E. SÁEZ ALVAREZ Universidad Católica de Valencia, España
  • Gema BACOANU Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania
  • Mihaela POROCH Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania
  • S. MARTIN UTRILLA Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (FIVO) Valencia, España
  • D. FERNANDEZ GARCIA Universidad Católica de Valencia, España

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22551/

Abstract

We carried out the translation, validation and cultural adaptation in Romanian language of the EBBCAM Questionnaire for the measurement of Perceived Death Competence in Medical and Nursing students. Materials and methods: 117 medical and nursing students of the Faculty of Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi. Results: The Romanian translation of the Bugen Brief Bugen Coping Competence in the Face of Death (EBBCAM) questionnaire, which is a multidimensional instrument consisting of 16 items, was administered. Subsequently, a Confirmatory Factor Analysis was performed in order to verify the validity of the measurement model. Both the study of the reliability of the responses (f1: .902; f2: .824; f3: .882 y f4: .828) and the Confirmatory Factor Analysis showed that the four-factor model had an adequate fit. (NNFI: .882; CFI: .920; IFI: .825 y RMSEA: .117). Conclusions: The Bugen Brief Competence in the Face of Death (EBBCAM) scale is a suitable instrument for the measurement of Perceived Competence in the Face of Death in Romanian-speaking students of Health Sciences (Medicine and Nursery).

Author Biographies

  • Adeline-Alexandra BĂIȘANU-ȚINTILĂ, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania

    Regional Institute of Oncology Iași, Romania

  • V. POROCH, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania

    Regional Institute of Oncology Iași, Romania

  • Gema BACOANU, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania

    Regional Institute of Oncology Iași, Romania

References

1. Payne SA, Dean SJ, Kalus C. A comparative study of death anxiety in hospice and emergency nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing 1998; 28(4): 700-706.

2. Servaty H, Krejci M, Hayslip, B. Relationships among death anxiety, communication apprehension with the dying, and empathy in those seeking occupations as nurses and physicians. Death Studies 1996; 20: 149-161.

3. Sousa A, Marina S, Ricou M. Spiritual Beliefs and Hastened Death: A Study on Medical Students. Omega: Journal of Death Dying 2022; 85(2): 384-408.

4. Rueda B, Pérez-García AM. Análisis comparativo de la competencia percibida general y la específica de salud. Ansiedad y Estrés 2004; 10: 127-139.

5. Camaño Puig R, Medrano Abalos P, et al. An assessment of the Bugen scale of competence about death. Nursing and Palliative Care 2020, 5 / doi: 10.15761/NPC.1000209.

6. Limonero J, Tomás-Sábado J, Fernández-Castro J, et al. Competencia personal percibida y ansiedad ante la muerte en estudiantes de enfermería. Ansiedad y Estrés 2010; 16(2-3): 177-188.

7. Sáez E, Burguete MD, Medrano P, López J, Martínez JR. Competencia percibida ante la muerte en estudiantes de Enfermería. Revista ROL 2019; 42(5): 342-348.

8. Medrano P. Competencia y miedo ante la muerte en estudiantes de primer y tercer curso del grado en enfermería (Tesis Doctoral) 2017, Universidad Católica de Valencia.

9. Medrano P, Sáez E, Vidal P, et al. Simplification and validation of Bugen’s coping with death scale in nursing students. Health, aging end of life 2020; 5: 11-20.

10. Byrne BM. Structural Equation Modeling with Mplus: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Pro-gramming. New York: Routledge, 2012.

11. Hu LT, Bentler PM. Evaluating model fit in SEM: Concepts, issues, and applications. In RH Hoyle (Editors), Structural Equation Modeling. Concepts, Issues and Applications, London, Sage: 1995, 76-99.

12. Tanaka JS. Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural equation models. In KA Bollen and JS Long, Testing Structural Equation Models, Newbury Park, CA: Sage1993, 10-39.

13. Wang J, Wang X. Structural Equation Modeling. Applications Using Mplus. West Sussex, UK: Wiley, 2012.

14. Hu LT, Bentler PM. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to under-parameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods 1998; 3: 424-453.

15. Browne MW, Cudeck R. Single sample cross-validation indices for covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research 1989; 24(4): 445-455.

16. Byrne BM. Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, 1998.

17. Cicchetti DV. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment 1994; 6(4): 284-290.

Additional Files

Published

2026-04-01

Issue

Section

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE - LABORATORY