MEANING IN LIFE AS A MEDIATOR BETWEEN CONSERVATISM AND QUALITY OF LIFE AMONG OLDER ADULTS: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY

Authors

  • Lăcrămioara COJOCARU Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Iași, Romania
  • Doina AZOICĂI Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania
  • Daniela MUNTELE-HENDREȘ Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Iași, Romania
  • Camelia SOPONARU Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Iași, Romania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22551/MSJ.2026.02.18

Abstract

Population aging presents growing challenges for maintaining quality of life in later adulthood. Conservative personal values and existential meaning are both associated with well-being in older adults, yet their functional relationship remains unclear. Aim: The present study aimed to investigate the mediating mechanism through which the presence of meaning in life influences the relationship between value conservatism and quality of life in older adults. Materials and methods: A sample of 210 participants (mean age = 74.5 years, SD = 6.24, 63.3% women) completed a battery of standardized questionnaires: the WHOQOL-OLD to assess quality of life, the Meaning in Life Questionnaire to assess existential meaning, and the Schwartz Value Survey to measure personal values. Mediation analysis was conducted using the PROCESS macro for SPSS version 28 (Model 4), applying a bootstrap procedure with 5,000 resamples. Results: The mediation analysis indicated that the presence of meaning in life partially mediated the relationship between conservatism and quality of life. Conservatism significantly predicted the presence of meaning (b = 0.072, p = .017), and the presence of meaning significantly predicted quality of life (b = 0.129, p = .005), even after controlling for conservatism. The indirect effect of conservatism on quality of life through the presence of meaning was significant (b = 0.0093; 95% CI [0.001, 0.024]), accounting for approximately 13.8% of the total effect. Conclusions: The findings demonstrate that conservative values enhance quality of life in older adults both directly and indirectly by strengthening existential meaning, providing empirical support for the development of integrated interventions focused on cultivating meaning and reinforcing stable values in the service of successful aging.

References

1. Rowe JW, Kahn RL. Successful aging 2.0: Conceptual expansions for the 21st century. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2015; 70(4): 593-596 / doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbv025.

2. WHOQOL Group. Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychol Med 1998; 28(3): 551-558 / doi: 10.1017/S0033291798006667.

3. Power M, Quinn K, Schmidt S. Development of the WHOQOL-OLD module. Qual Life Res 2005; 14(10): 2197-214 / doi: 10.1007/s11136-005-7380-9.

4. Steptoe A, Deaton A, Stone AA. Subjective well-being, health, and ageing. Lancet 2015; 385(9968): 640-648 / doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61489-0.

5. Bardi A, Lee JA, Hofmann-Towfigh N, Soutar G. The structure of intraindividual value change. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009; 97(5): 913-929 / doi: 10.1037/a0016617.

6. Robinson OC. Values and adult age: findings from two cohorts of the European Social Survey. Eur J Ageing 2013; 10(1): 11-23 / doi: 10.1007/s10433-012-0247-3.

7. Martela F, Steger MF. The three meanings of meaning in life: distinguishing coherence, purpose, and significance. J Posit Psychol 2016; 11(5): 531-545 / doi: 10.1080/17439760.2015.1137623.

8. Alimujiang A, Wiensch A, Boss J, et al. Association between life purpose and mortality among U.S. adults older than 50 years. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2(5): e194270 / doi: 10.1001/ jamanetwork open.2019.4270.

9. Boyle PA, Barnes LL, Buchman AS, Bennett DA. Purpose in life is associated with mortality among community-dwelling older persons. Psychosom Med 2009; 71(5): 574-579 / doi: 10.1097/ PSY.0b013e3181a5a7c0.

10. Atchley RC. A continuity theory of normal aging. Gerontologist 1989; 29(2): 183-190 / doi: 10.1093/geront/29.2.183

11. Steger MF, Frazier P, Oishi S, Kaler M. The meaning in life questionnaire: assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. J Couns Psychol 2006; 53(1): 80-93 / doi: 10.1037/0022-0167. 53.1.80.

12. Schwartz SH. Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In: Zanna MP, editor. Advances in experimental social psychology. Volume 25. San Diego: Academic Press, 1992, 1-65.

13. Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press, 2018.

14. Carstensen LL. Social and emotional patterns in adulthood: Support for socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychol Aging 1992; 7(3): 331-38 / doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.7.3.331

15. Carstensen LL. Evidence for a life-span theory of socioemotional selectivity. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 1995; 4(5): 151-156 / doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.ep11512261.

16. Park CL. The meaning making model: A framework for understanding meaning, spirituality, and stress-related growth in health psychology. Eur Health Psychol. 2013; 15(2): 40-47.

17. Schnell T. The psychology of meaning in life. New York: Routledge, 2021.

Additional Files

Published

2026-06-01

Issue

Section

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE - LABORATORY