A PRELIMINARY EVALUATION OF RESIDENTS’ PERCEPTION OF THEIR TRAINING AND KNOWLEDGE ON THREE-DIMENSIONAL IMAGING

Authors

  • Yllka DEÇOLLI University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T. Popa” - Iaşi
  • Danisia HABA University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T. Popa” - Iaşi
  • Ana Elena PETCU University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T. Popa” - Iaşi
  • Adriana BALAN University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T. Popa” - Iaşi
  • Irina Nicoleta ZETU University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T. Popa” - Iaşi
  • Olga-Odetta DUMA University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T. Popa” - Iaşi

Abstract

The aim of this preliminary study was to assess the residents’ perception on their training program and on their knowledge regarding the use and interpretation of three-dimensional imaging techniques in their clinical practice. Material and methods: A multi-item questionnaire was distributed among 104 residents training in four medical specialties at the University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T. Popa” in Iaşi. Results: Fifty-five residents agreed to fill in the questionnaire, achieving a participating rate of 52.88%. The majority of the respondents (74.5%) declared to indicate classic CT scans to their patients. A significantly lower fraction of the participating residents (32.7%) affirmed to indicate CBCT scans. Electronic literature was the most common information source on the use of three-dimensional imaging (52.7%). Most of the residents declared that they cannot interpret correctly CT and CBCT scans (78.2%, respectively 83.6%). A significant percentage of the respondents considered that the level of training provided on the interpretation of CT and CBCT results is very low (49.1%, respectively 60.0%). Conclusions: The residents’ perception of the quality of their education regarding 3D imaging modalities, along with their perception of their knowledge in this area, indicates the necessity to improve their didactic and practical training. A further extended survey will be conducted to evaluate the educational experience of residents from all medical specialties that use 3D imaging techniques in neck and head imaging.

Author Biographies

  • Yllka DEÇOLLI, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T. Popa” - Iaşi

    Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

  • Danisia HABA, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T. Popa” - Iaşi

    Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

  • Ana Elena PETCU, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T. Popa” - Iaşi

    Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

  • Adriana BALAN, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T. Popa” - Iaşi

    Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

  • Irina Nicoleta ZETU, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T. Popa” - Iaşi

    Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

  • Olga-Odetta DUMA, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T. Popa” - Iaşi

    Department of Public Health and Management

References

1. Damman F, Bootz F, Cohnen M, Hassfeld S, Tatagiba M, Kösling S. Diagnostic imaging modalities in head and neck disease. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014; 111(23-24): 417-423.
2. Slovis TL. Where we were, what has changed, what needs doing: a decade of progress. Pediatr Radiol. 2011; 41(Suppl 2): 456-460.
3. Berdahl CT, Vermeulen MJ, Larson DB, Schull MJ. Emergency department computed tomography utilization in the United States and Canada. Ann Emerg Med. 2013; 62(5): 486-494.e3.
4. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Tinazzi Martini P, Bergamo Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol. 1998; 8(9): 1558-1564.
5. Arai Y, Tammisalo E, Iwai K, Hashimoto K, Shinoda K. Development of a compact computed tomo-graphic apparatus for dental use. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1999 Jul;28(4):245-8.
6. Wortche R, Hassfeld S, Lux CJ, Mussig E, Hensley FW, Krempien R, Hofele C. Clinical application of cone beam digital volume tomography in children with cleft lip and palate. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006; 35(2): 88-94.
7. Silva MA, Wolf U, Heinicke F, Bumann A, Visser H, Hirsch E. Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 133(5): 640.e1-5.
8. Ianucci JM, Howerton LJ. Dental Radiography Principles and Techniques. Elsevier Saunders, 2012.
9. De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GR. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 38(6): 609-25.
10. Smith BR, Park JH, Cederberg RA. 2011. An evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography use in postgraduate orthodontic programs in the United States and Canada. J Dent Educ. 2011; 75(1): 98-106.
11. Parashar V, Whaites E, Monsour P, Chaudry J, Geist JR. Cone beam computed tomography in dental education: a survey of US, UK, and Australian dental schools. J Dent Educ. 2012; 76(11): 1443-1147.
12. Brown J, Jacobs R, Levring Jäghagen E, Lindh C, Baksi G, Schulze D, Schulze R. European Academy of DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology. Basic training requirements for the use of dental CBCT by dentists: a position paper prepared by the European Academy of DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2014; 43(1): 20130291.
13. Adibi S, Zhang W, Servos T, O’Neill PN. Cone beam computed tomography in dentistry: what dental educators and learners should know. J Dent Educ. 2012; 76(11): 1437-1442.
14. Scarfe WC, Li Z, Aboelmaaty W, Scott SA, Farman AG. Maxillofacial cone beam computed tomog-raphy: essence, elements and steps to interpretation. Aust Dent J. 2012; 57(Suppl 1): 46-60.

Additional Files

Published

2015-06-30