RISK FACTORS AND PREDICTORS OF CROSSBITE AT CHILDREN

Authors

  • Georgeta ZEGAN University of Medicine and Pharmacy“Grigore T. Popa”-Iaşi
  • Cristina Gena DASCALU University of Medicine and Pharmacy“Grigore T. Popa”-Iaşi
  • R.B. MAVRU University of Medicine and Pharmacy“Grigore T. Popa”-Iaşi
  • Loredana GOLOVCENCU University of Medicine and Pharmacy“Grigore T. Popa”-Iaşi

Abstract

Aim: was to determine the etiological risk factors and predictors of crossbite’ treatment at children. Material and methods: 270 cases with crossbites and 255 controls with other malocclusions were uniformly evaluated. The crossbites cases were divided in group I (anterior crossbite), group II (posterior crossbite) and group III (anterior and posterior crossbites) and were compared between them per Angle Class malocclusions, dysfunctional and dental causes, associations with other discrepancies, as well by need and types of treatment. Binary logistic regression was used to find risk factors and predictors. Results: The mean age of cases was 10.25±2.770 years. There were found significant differences between the groups of crossbites cases (p<0.05). There were identified risk factors (non-attrition of deciduous teeth, Angle Class II malocclusion and permanent teeth extraction) and protective factors of the crossbite (the tooth decay of deciduous teeth, eruption anomalies and tongue-thrust swallowing). There were found predictors for early corrective treatment (sucking habit, non-attrition and buds crowding) with a precision of 78.5%; for normal treatment (mouth breathing and buds crowding) with a precision of 71.5%; for late treatment (Angle Class III malocclusion, dental crowding and TMJ disorders) with a precision of 83.0%; for maxillary expansion (eruption anomalies and buds crowding) with a precision of 77.0%; for oral associated surgery (macrodontia and TMJ disorders) with a precision of 75.9% (HL test, p>0.05). Conclusion: The risk factors were dental furthermore; the predictors of treatment were adequate with dentition, etiology and disorders at age identification, suggesting the contribution of practitioners in intercepting this orthodontic emergency.

Author Biographies

  • Georgeta ZEGAN, University of Medicine and Pharmacy“Grigore T. Popa”-Iaşi

    Faculty of Dental Medicine
    Department of Surgery

  • Cristina Gena DASCALU, University of Medicine and Pharmacy“Grigore T. Popa”-Iaşi

    Faculty of Medicine
    Department of Preventive Medicine and Interdisciplinarity

  • R.B. MAVRU, University of Medicine and Pharmacy“Grigore T. Popa”-Iaşi

    Faculty of Dental Medicine
    Department of Surgery

  • Loredana GOLOVCENCU, University of Medicine and Pharmacy“Grigore T. Popa”-Iaşi

    Faculty of Dental Medicine
    Department of Surgery

References

1. Moyers RE. Handbook of orthodontics. 4th ed. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, Inc.; 1988.
2. Proffit WR, Fields HW. Contemporary Orthodontics. 4th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, Inc.; 2007.
3. Kennedy DB, Osepchook M. Unilateral posterior crossbite with mandibular shift: a review. JCDA 2005; 71(8): 569-573.
4. DaSilva Filho OG, Santamaria JrM, Filho LP. Epidemiology of posterior crossbite in the primary dentition. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2007; 32(1): 73-78.
5. Borrie F, Beam D. Early correction of anterior crossbites: a systematic review. J Orthod 2011; 38: 175-184.
6. Andrade AS, Gameiro GH, DeRossi M, Gavião MBD. Posterior crossbite and functional changes: a systematic review. Angle Orthod 2009; 79(2): 380-386.
7. Piancino MG, Comino E, Talpone F, Vallelonga T, Frongia G, Bracco P. Reverse-sequencing chewing patterns evaluation in anterior versus posterior unilateral crossbite patients. Eur J Orthod 2012; 34: 536-541.
8. Uysal T, Yagci A, Ramoglu SI. Dental maturation in patients with unilateral posterior crossbite. World J Orthod 2009; 10: 383-388.
9. Tecco S, Festa F. Prevalence of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders in children and adolescents with and without crossbites. World J Orthod 2010; 11(1): 37-42.
10. Thilander B, Bjerklin K. Posterior crossbite and temporomandibular disorders (TMDs): need for orthodontic treatment ? Eur J Orthod 2012; 34: 667-673.
11. Ferro F, Spinella P, Lama N. Transverse maxillary arch form and mandibular asymmetry in patients with posterior unilateral crossbite. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 140: 828-838.
12. Anistoroaei D.Panoramic analysis in diagnosis of cranio-maxillo-facial asymmetries. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi 2009; 113 (1): 250-256.
13. Talapaneni AK, Nuvvula S. The association between posterior unilateral crossbite and craniomandibular asymmetry: a systematic review. Angle Orthod 2012; 39: 279-291.
14. Michelotti A, Farella M, Buonocore G, Pellegrino G, Piergentili C, Martina R. Is unilateral posterior crossbite associated with leg length inequality? Eur J Orthod 2007; 29: 622-626.
15. Steiner CC. The use of cephalometrics as an aid to planning and assessing orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1960; 46: 721-735.
16. Brook PH, Shaw WC. The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority. Eur J Orthod 1989; 20: 309-320.
17. Volk J, Kadivec M, Music MM, Ovsenikd M. Three-dimensional ultrasound diagnostics of tongue posture in children with unilateral posterior crossbite. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 138: 608-612.
18. Primožič J, Franchi L, Perinetti G, Richmond S, Ovsenik M. Influence of sucking habits and breathing pattern on palatal constriction in unilateral posterior crossbite - controlled study. Eur J Orthod 2013; 34: 706-712.
19. Ge YS, Liu J, Guo X, Han JL. A follow-up study of early interceptive treatment of primary anterior crossbites. Eur J Orthod 2011; 33: 551-557.
20. Petrén S, Bjerklin K, Marké LA, Bondemark L. Early correction of posterior crossbite – a cost-minimization analysis. Eur J Orthod 2013; 35: 14-21.
21. Binder RE. Correction of posterior crossbites: diagnosis and treatment. Pediatr Dent 2004; 26(3): 266-272.
22. Zuccati G, Casci S, Doldo T, Clauser C. Expansion of maxillary arches with crossbite: a systematic review of RCTs in the last 12 years. Eur J Orthod 2013; 35: 29-37.
23. DaCosta OO; Utomi IL. A clinical review of crossbite in an orthodontic population. West African J Med 2011; 30(1): 24-28.
24. Corega C, Băciuţ M, Corega M, et al. A combined surgical-orthodontic approach of a Class II/1 maloclusion. A case report. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi 2008; 112 (1): 240-245.
25. Yano N, Ono Y, Takagi Y. Prediction of mandibular growth in children with anterior crossbite. Pediatr Dent J 2009; 19(2): 212-219.

Additional Files

Published

2015-06-30