RETROSPECTIVE STUDY ON THE ETIOLOGICAL SPECTRUM AND ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE IN INFECTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH OSTEOSYNTHESIS MATERIALS

Authors

  • D. TUCALIUC University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T. Popa”-Iaşi
  • O. ALEXA University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T. Popa”-Iaşi
  • Cristina Gabriela TUCHILUS University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T. Popa”-Iaşi
  • Ramona Gabriela URSU University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T. Popa”-Iaşi
  • Elena Simona TUCALIUC University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T. Popa”-Iaşi
  • Luminita Smaranda IANCU University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T. Popa”-Iaşi

Keywords:

PERIPROTETIC INFECTIONS, BIOFILM, IMPLANT, MRSA.

Abstract

Aim: To determine the prevalence of infections according to their etiologic spectrum and antibiotic sensitivity in patients with or without implants and endoprostheses. Material and methods: This retrospective study was conducted based on a customized study protocol on 773 cases admitted to the Clinic of Orthopedics – Traumatology of the Iaşi “Sf. Spiridon” Emergency Hospital in the interval January 1, 2003 - December 31, 2011 for postoperative infectious complication. Results: S. aureus was more frequently found in the patients without implant (58.2%) and in those with subcutaneous implant (45.5%); the lowest frequency was noticed in the patients with endoprosthesis (27.1%), the frequency distributions showing marked statistically significant differences (p=0,001). P. aeruginosa was more frequently detected in the patient group with endoprosthesis (30.2%), while in the other groups it was found in approximately 7% (p=0.001). The presence of Acinetobacter spp. was significantly higher in patients with deep implant (12.9%), with the lowest frequency noticed in the patients without implant (4.5%) (p=0.029). Of the total isolated and identified types, 59.6% were non-multidrug-resistant (non-MDR), the remaining 40.4% being MDR types. Conclusions: S. aureus was the most frequent etiological agent in patients with or without cutaneous implant (45.5 and 58.2%, respectively), and P. aeruginosa (30.2%) in the endoprosthesized patients. Implementation of a preoperative screening protocol for the identification of healthy S. aureus carriers (Methicillin-sensitive S. aureus - MSSA / Methicillin-resistant S. aureus - MRSA) and subsequent decolonization would be an efficient way of reducing the incidence of infections caused by this bacterium.

Author Biographies

  • D. TUCALIUC, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T. Popa”-Iaşi

    Faculty of Medicine
    Ph.D. student

  • O. ALEXA, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T. Popa”-Iaşi

    Faculty of Medicine
    Discipline of Orthopedics-Traumatology

  • Cristina Gabriela TUCHILUS, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T. Popa”-Iaşi

    Faculty of Medicine
    Discipline of Microbiology

  • Ramona Gabriela URSU, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T. Popa”-Iaşi

    Faculty of Medicine
    Discipline of Microbiology

  • Elena Simona TUCALIUC, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T. Popa”-Iaşi

    Faculty of Medicine
    Discipline of Microbiology

  • Luminita Smaranda IANCU, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T. Popa”-Iaşi

    Faculty of Medicine                                                                                                                                                        Discipline of Microbiology
    National Institute of Public Health                                                                                                                          Regional Center of Public Health - Iaşi

References

1. Parker MJ, Stedtfeld HW. Internal fixation of Intracapsular Hip Fractures with a Dynamic Locking Plate: Initial Experience and Results for 83 Patients Treated with a New Implant. Injury 2010; 41: 348–351.
2. Somme D, Ziza JM, Desplaces N, et al. Contribution of Routine Joint Aspiration to the Diagnosis of Infection before Hip Revision Surgery. Joint Bone Spine 2003; 70: 489–495.
3. Espehaug B, Engesaeter L, Vollset S, Havelin L, Langeland NJ. Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Total Hip Arthroplasty. Review of 10,905 Primary Cemented Total Hip Replacements Reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, 1987 to 1995. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1997; 79: 590–595.
4. Berbari EF, Hanssen AD, Duffy MC. Risk Factors for Prosthetic Joint Infection: Case-Control Study. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1998; 27: 1247–1254.
5. Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, et al. Multidrug-Resistant, Extensively Drug-Resistant and Pandrug-Resistant Bacteria: An International Expert Proposal for Interim Standard Definitions for Acquired Resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect 2012; 18: 268–281.
6. Dresing K. Infections in Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2013; 25: 220-224.
7. Fernandes A, Dias M. The Microbiological Profiles of Infected Prosthetic Implants with an Emphasis on the Organisms which Form Biofilms. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013; 7: 219-223.
8. Mabit C, Marcheix PS, Mounier M, Dijoux P, Pestourie N, Bonnevialle P, Bonnomet F; French Soci-ety of Orthopaedic Surgery, Traumatology (SOFCOT). Impact of a Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Sur-veillance Program in Orthopedics and Traumatology. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012; 98: 690-695.
9. Peel TN, Cheng AC, Buising KL, Choong PF. Microbiological Aetiology, Epidemiology, and Clinical Profile of Prosthetic Joint Infections: Are Current Antibiotic Prophylaxis Guidelines Effective? Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012; 56: 2386-2391.
10. Edwards C, Counsell A, Boulton C, Moran CG. Early Infection after Hip Fracture Surgery, Risk Factors, Costs and Outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008; 90: 770-777.
11. Jämsen E, Huhtala H, Puolakka T, Moilanen T. Risk Factors for Infection after Knee Arthroplasty. A Register-Based Analysis of 43149 Cases. J Bone Joint Surg. 2009; 91: 38-47.
12. Pulido L, Ghanem E, Joshi A, Purtill J J, Parvizi J. Periprosthetic Joint Infection: The Incidence, Timing, and Predisposing Factors. Clin Orthop. 2008; 466: 1710-1715.
13. Meding J B, Klay M, Healy A, Ritter M A, Keating E M, Berend M E. The Prescreening History and Physical in Elective Total Joint Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22: 21-23.

Additional Files

Published

2018-05-16

Issue

Section

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE - LABORATORY